<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chad Huard &#187; Driver Measurements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chadhuard.com/category/audio/driver-measurements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chadhuard.com</link>
	<description>Wayne State University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:04:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Distortion Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 22:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Driver Measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cmhaudio.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been doing a few distortion measurements of the drivers in my current project. I have become concerned about the distortion products of the mic itself. The following is a test of the distortion of my HDS Nomex driver driven at 2.83V with mic distances of 4&#8243;, 8&#8243; &#38; 16&#8243;. The distortion products should [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been doing a few distortion measurements of the drivers in my current project. I have become concerned about the distortion products of the mic itself. The following is a test of the distortion of my HDS Nomex driver driven at 2.83V with mic distances of 4&#8243;, 8&#8243; &amp; 16&#8243;. The distortion products should be the same % in each, any increase can be directly attributed to the mic.</p>

<a href='http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/4inch_1watt/' title='Mic at 4&quot;'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.chadhuard.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/4inch_1watt-150x150.gif" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="Mic at 4&quot;" /></a>
<a href='http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/8inch_1watt/' title='Mic at 8&quot;'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.chadhuard.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/8inch_1watt-150x150.gif" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="Mic at 8&quot;" /></a>
<a href='http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/16inch_1watt/' title='Mic at 16&quot;'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://www.chadhuard.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/16inch_1watt-150x150.gif" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="" title="Mic at 16&quot;" /></a>

<p><span style="color: #999999;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>Click on any image above and use keyboard arrow keys to quickly compare images.</em></span></span></p>
<p>As you can see, the 3rd harmonic doesn&#8217;t change apreciably. The 2nd on the other hand increases dramatically with each doubling of the SPL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/05/distortion-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seas 27TBFC/G H1212 mod</title>
		<link>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/02/seas-h1212/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/02/seas-h1212/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Driver Measurements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1212]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hexagrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phase shield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmhaudio.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seas H1212 is one of the most highly regarded tweeters amongst DIYers&#8230; for good reason. You can check out some of its measurements at Zaph Audio&#8217;s tweeter measurement pages, and you can check out the manufacturer data at Madisound&#8217;s site.  One of the things that everybody has an opinion on is the hexagrid cover.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seas H1212 is one of the most highly regarded tweeters amongst DIYers&#8230; for good reason. You can check out some of its measurements at <a href="http://www.zaphaudio.com/tweetermishmash/" target="_blank">Zaph Audio&#8217;s tweeter measurement pages</a>, and you can check out the manufacturer data at <a href="http://www.madisound.com/catalog/product_info.php?manufacturers_id=149&amp;products_id=795" target="_blank">Madisound&#8217;s site</a>.  One of the things that everybody has an opinion on is the hexagrid cover.  Some will not buy a tweeter without it (these are usually people with kids <img src='http://www.chadhuard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) but many find it ugly.  Still others talk about the negative effects of the phase shield attached to the inside of the grid cover.  I decided to see what happens when you take the thing off.</p>
<p>The cover is not hard to remove, or replace for that matter. All you need to do is grab it with some small pliers and pull&#8230; that&#8217;s it. It is held on by some tacky glue and can be replaced with just the power of the magnet and the tackiness of the glue. The only thing to watch out for is the possibility of the cover being pulled into the delicate dome by the magnet, so just be careful and make sure you have a good grip. These measurements were taken on a poorly planned baffle and therefor include some serious diffraction effects.</p>
<div id="attachment_30" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/with_hexgrid.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-large wp-image-30" title="Frequency Responce with Grid" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/with_hexgrid-1024x756.gif" alt="Frequency Responce with Grid" width="400" height="295" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Frequency Response with Grid</p></div>
<p><span id="more-29"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_32" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/without_hexgrid.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-large wp-image-32" title="Frequency Response without Grid" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/without_hexgrid-1024x753.gif" alt="Frequency Response without Grid" width="400" height="295" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Frequency Response without Grid</p></div>
<p>As you can see, the phase shield effects the top octave dispersion pattern and not much else.  Personally I don&#8217;t see the reason for the shield from these plots, the response without the grid looks better to me, but I have heard it argued the other way too and obviously SEAS thinks it is better with the shield, or they wouldn&#8217;t have put it in there.</p>
<p>So does the phase shield effect any other aspects of the driver?  Here are some distortion plots with and without the shield:</p>
<div id="attachment_36" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/im_with_30deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-36" title="Intermodulation Distortion with Cover (30 degrees off axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/im_with_30deg.gif" alt="Intermodulation Distortion with Cover (30 degrees off axis)" width="400" height="217" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Inter-modulation Distortion with Cover (30 degrees off axis)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_38" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/im_without_30deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-38" title="Intermodulation Distortion without Cover (30 degrees off axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/im_without_30deg.gif" alt="Intermodulation Distortion without Cover (30 degrees off axis)" width="400" height="217" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Inter-modulation Distortion without Cover (30 degrees off axis)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_39" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withhex_0deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-39" title="Swept Distortion with Grid (on axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withhex_0deg.gif" alt="Swept Distortion with Grid (on axis)" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swept Distortion with Grid (on axis)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_37" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withouthex_0deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-37" title="Swept Distortion without Grid (on axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withouthex_0deg.gif" alt="Swept Distortion without Grid (on axis)" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swept Distortion without Grid (on axis)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_40" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withhex_30deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-40" title="Swept Distortion with Grid (30 degrees off axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withhex_30deg.gif" alt="Swept Distortion with Grid (30 degrees off axis)" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swept Distortion with Grid (30 degrees off axis)</p></div>
<div id="attachment_41" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withouthex_30deg.gif" target="_blank" rel="lightbox[29]"><img class="size-full wp-image-41" title="Swept Distortion without Grid (30 degrees off axis)" src="http://cmhaudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/dist_withouthex_30deg.gif" alt="Swept Distortion without Grid (30 degrees off axis)" width="400" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swept Distortion without Grid (30 degrees off axis)</p></div>
<p>So, what does it all mean?  It means I wasted a lot of time!  The only difference I can measure is the FR difference above 10k.  So leave it on?  Take it off?  I would take it off.  Testing with my ears is always part of the process too, and there is definitely an audible difference between the two.  I prefer the sound without the phase shield.  The good news is that it is the little sticker inside of the grid that acts as the shield, so if you want you can remove the sticker and keep the shield on.  The even better news is that since it really doesn&#8217;t change the frequency response below 10k you can do this with any of the available designs that use this popular tweeter and not have to worry about ruining the crossover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chadhuard.com/2009/02/seas-h1212/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

